We Understand That Results Matter

Photo of Jeffrey P. Boyd and Ricky L. Boren

Was the other driver on their phone? Proving distracted driving

On Behalf of | Aug 3, 2026 | Car Accidents |

A moment of distraction is all it takes to cause a serious car accident. If you suspect the other driver was using their phone, proving it may require more than your own observations. Understanding the available evidence can help explain how distracted driving is established after a crash.

Understanding Tennessee’s distracted driving laws

Tennessee takes distracted driving seriously. State law prohibits all drivers from holding or physically supporting a mobile phone while operating a vehicle. Drivers under age 18 face stricter rules and harsher penalties for violations.

Violations can result in fines. However, they also establish negligence in accident claims. When drivers break these laws and cause crashes, they can be held financially responsible for resulting injuries and damages.

Common signs of phone use behind the wheel

Certain crash patterns suggest distracted driving. Accidents involving rear-end collisions often indicate a driver was not watching the road. Vehicles drifting between lanes or running off the roadway also raise red flags. Witnesses may report seeing a driver looking down at their lap or holding a phone before impact. Even small details matter when building a case.

Types of evidence that prove distraction

Phone records serve as powerful evidence in distracted driving cases. These records show the exact time drivers made calls, sent texts or used apps. In some cases, legal counsel can subpoena this information from wireless carriers.

Additionally, police reports may document officer observations at the scene. Surveillance footage from nearby businesses or traffic cameras can also capture a driver using their phone. Some vehicles have event data recorders that capture what happened before a crash.

Challenges in obtaining phone records

Getting phone records is not always simple. Privacy laws protect this information. In such cases, proper legal channels must be followed. The process requires filing formal requests and sometimes court orders. Carriers may take weeks to respond. Additionally, drivers may deny phone use or claim hands-free operation. Taking prompt action can help prevent important evidence from being lost or deleted.

Holding distracted drivers accountable

Phone use behind the wheel can have serious consequences. While proving distraction can be challenging, evidence from several sources can help reveal what happened. A thorough investigation is often key to understanding the cause of a crash.

Archives

FindLaw Network
Lawyers Involved For Tennessee
Rated by | Super Lawyers | Ricky L. Boren | SuperLawyers.com
Rated by | Super Lawyers | Jeffrey P. Boyd | SuperLawyers.com
Martindale-Hubbell | AV | Preeminent® | Peer Rated for Highest Level Of Professional Excellence | 2023
Martindale-Hubbell | AV | Preeminent® | Peer Rated for Highest Level Of Professional Excellence | 2022
Lead Counsel Rated | LC
Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association | Member 2022- 2023 Board Member
LIFT | Member 2021- 2022
TTLA Circle of Advocates | Member 2021 -2022
American Associaton For Justice | The Association For Trial Lawyers | Member
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100
Motor Vehicle Trial Lawyers | Top 25
Martindale-Hubbell | Distinguished® | Peer Rated for High Professional Achievement | 2017
Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association | Member 2026 - 2027 | Executive Committee
Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association | Member 2026 - 2027 | Board Member